Looking for:
Capture one pro 8 vs lightroom free download.Capture One vs Lightroom (Which One Should You Choose?) |
- Capture One Pro 8 software review: Digital Photography Review
They have different advantages. But I wish the round-trip workflow was easier and more intuitive. Also the integration between C1 and the company's own Media-Pro is not smooth. IT is far ahead of lightroom. While phase one team concentrated at processing algorithms, Adobe introduced gimmicks like gradient filters and face recognition. Fuji X demosaicing have also been always better. C1 is from my point of view the best raw converter on the market. Sony was smart to partner with them and their dedication to Fuji X-trans is admirable.
After playing with Capture One 8 pro for a couple of weeks. I can't really say it is better than LR5. In fact, sometimes I found LR5 actually shows better details.
Each software renders a bit differently and to me, and its hard for me to say which is really better. The "improvement", actually I would rather call it the difference is not enough for me to change.
I think this is quite true. CO8 is far far better colour wise in terms of getting to great colour quite quickly I find for things like hair LR6 does a much better job. I have been reading all the back and forth comments on here about Capture One vs Lightroom. I had been using Lightroom since Version 1. I tried Capture One on a trial and didn't but it because I was somewhat confused by the import process.
However, I decided to try it again and I am so glad I did. I had always shot Canon and really struggled to get some images right. Well, it is a documented fact that Lightroom is no good on Fuji raw files. Capture One did an excellent job on them.
For comparison, I went back and tried to edit some of my Canon files that had been especially troublesome to get right in LR and I was amazed.
What one poster said about the LR presets transferring to other images is so true. I spent a lot of money on presets and was never really happy. I also found that in C1 and yes, that does stand for capture One , I didn't have the need for all those presets. And if I did make up one for one photo in a shoot it would transfer nicely to all others.
I reedited a wedding that took me hours in LR and I never was really happy there was some really strange lighting in the church and it was faster and I got much better results. I have found the dynamic range sliders in C1 to be far superior to LR and have brought back highlights and shadows in photos that I had not been able to do in LR. No, I don't work for C1.
I'm just a convinced convert. For a lot of people, including myself, sometimes it is easier to stick with what you are familiar with. Can never understand why people think that a third party knows a camera manufacturer's RAW algorithm better than the camera manufacturer and, of course, the latter's converter comes free.
In most instances, the software is designed and implemented by an entirely different software company; if not, at the very least the software division of the camera company might as well be another entity - they are so entirely separate from hardware in structure and mission. Sensor profile "proprietary information" isn't a huge hill to climb for Adobe Fuji not withstanding , Phase One, or Dxo - the leading converters.
Even if the software and hardware departments are separate, they work together, very closely, throughout the design phases of a project. That also includes outside suppliers, such as a sensor supplier if it is not made in house. They meet constantly, daily, weekly, etc.
They work on a project as a team for that projects, from the various departments, product planners, suppliers, lawyers for legal matters , marketing, finance, etc. So Skipper has a good point. But the issue with free RAW converters that are provided with the cameras is that it is minimal and limited with what it can do in terms of editing.
The other bigger issue is that the people who are familiar and comfortable with the use of a certain software package don't want to bother with something else. They'll always swear by their program, and don't want to bother with anything else. I disagree. NX2 is good just very slow. But using too much shadow loses too much colour. D-lghting though is hopeless. But used gently it is much better than ACR. Just save jpg and finish off in Photoshop. Conversely I believe camera makers should stick to their knitting and make cameras, leaving software to professionals.
Better that they give the algorithms away in licence deals and allow someone specialising in software to do the job properly. It's only useful if you intend to never buy a new camera or update to a newer OS. I liked it, even if it was horribly slow. But it's time to move on. Actually, far more capability overall and a tangible IQ improvement. You might want to test drive it before drawing that conclusion. And as mentioned below, for serious work LR is far more clunky and does not use computer resources nearly as efficiently.
Only in cataloguing does LR have an edge - and then only a slight one. What works best, fits budget and workflow, will dictate the market - subscription or ownership as desired. Phase One markets Capture One for a smaller class of photographers who highly value aspects of the software that are otherwise poorly implemented by Adobe, or not offered at all.
To say these aesthetics are "correct" or not might be what's right for you, but not held universally. Alexey, I'm on cs6, it has to serve me in "forseable future" using Adobe's terms. For me it is mainly plugin host and printer driver but as for the late use of PS-I'm thinking about qimage.
And c1p upgrades are sometimes fery friendly priced. What is that got to do with Reilly and my post? Or are you not reading it? The first three posts were about subscription based costs comparison between C1 and CC - the fact that you don't use it is irrelevant in that context. But since you have brought it up - LR standalone still costs less than C1 even though it is less feature rich.
Adding something like Affinity Photo to it to replace photoshop or Photoline if you are on windows will remove that gap though. Alexey, for me main usage for raw developer is RAW processing with some minor adjustments, combined with smooth workflow.
IMO even free photoshop can't compensate this difference, mainly because there are a few PS alternatives that costs fraction of year subscription. Personally I use LR as cataloguing tool with simple postprocessing features.
From that prospective C1 offers me 0 advantage. Alexey, for many cc gives 0 advantage. There are number of other options, that allows to share Your library with others of course, with searching engine. C1P used to integrate with DAM software. However, this is now little abandoned option, but still more useful than LR in many aspects.
Read it again then. And demonstrate what specifically you can achieve in C1 alone that CC subscription does not offer. Alexey, generally nothing extra to be achieved, except IQ. Not big difference, but believe me, it is there. There is nothing more that can be achieved by a finest cognac or whisky that cannot be achieved by the hooch.
I don't tend to belive someone I don't know and I do my own research. I suggest you do the same. Alexey, I did my own research. I've bought LR3, then upgraded to LR4. I even bought fancy ColorChecker Passport. Yours results may be different - it depends on Your needs and on Your equipment because acr works better for Canon than for Nikon. Re: profile building with passport - you should have tried QPcard in a similar price range.
The CC SG is a better one but requires careful shooting. I'm drawing my conclusion from my experience and observations. No, thanks. Maybe full colorchecker this version with much pore patches with proper SW. But why, if c1p works fine without it btw, CNX was rendering colors of passport better than calibrated lightroom.
Keep drawing your conclusions then, judging by your replies you have not even bothered to understand how to profile properly let alone judge software output with mediocre profiles.
Photoshop at least succeeds at being a decent enough editor which is why you can do there much more than in your beloved C1 if you actually bothered to learn it. You can discover that there are a number of capable image editors besides photoshop, if you discover how to learn.
There are tons of books for Adobe workflow, so many can follow them like a sheep, claiming that they have some high level knowledge. Actually, this "knowledge" does not allows to solve problem, it allows to replicate steps proposed by others.
With this kind of knowledge other software is beyond ones perception abilities. But this is not my problem. Have nice time with Your beloved software. I spent with Photoshop more time than I wish to, making stuff much more complicated than simple photoediting. I'm using it more than 15 years. But I also look on the other editors. Looking at this sample of images, it is easy to neglect Your statement about my ignorance. For way more complicated work, this I've mentioned before, I'm testing another piece of software.
I seems to fit all my needs, including intelligent objects, advanced text options here PS falls behind , vector layers, image enhancing editing, plugin hosting plus much more, in a fraction of PS price.
Yes, there exists true world outside this created by propaganda. So again, enjoy your sophisticated tinkering with photos, involving the best software ever.
Have a nice day. First, let me comment that Damien has put together a balanced and accurate review. He hasn't been perfect in that regard on recent product announcements, but here he has hit the basics well.
As someone who has extensively used LR and C1 pretty much equally over the past years, I can comment on the relative ease of use of each. To get a quick image processed relatively well, LR is a bit quicker overall. Possibly, 1 minute vs. Most of my work is serious, requiring color accuracy throughout the range, clarity, sharpening, micro-contrast, dynamic range adjustment and noise reduction and possible film grain on occasion.
What can be done in 6 minutes in C1, will take at least 10 minutes in LR - and you simply can't get the color precision you need using arbitrary sliders.
Also, Structure can provide better depth, allowing you to avoid overuse of Clarity; the interplay between Structure and Clarity is powerful, and LR doesn't include a similar function.
So much seems to depend on what camera you're using. I care more about color than sharpness and detail, and many people absolutely rave about the colors C1 gives them. With Sony A and A7 files, I struggle with skin tones. Across a variety of shades, everyone looks like they're wearing bronzer. I can't help but open "keepers" in C1, LR, and Photos.
C1, despite my best efforts, rarely looks best. Any other Sony users see this? Yes, it is puzzling with my RX as well. It seems the reds have too much yellow in them. You can correct that by shooting a colorchecker, going to the Advanced tab in the Color Editor, selecting the red patch, limiting the selected hues and modifying the Hue slider by a value that brings the orange reds to a more satisfying red.
Then make a preset out of it, or make an icc profile and apply it with a style on import. Following force10's excellent suggestion below to use,Phase One's effective feature videos, here's one that directly addresses shifting from over from previously-learned Lightroom:. The difference is like having a good copy of a lens versus having a bad copy of a lens on the camera. Tried Capture One. Once I got past the photo storage tools, the results were excellent.
There are two issue from my point of view: -it is made for people who have perfect vision: the controls are simply too small for those of us whose eyes are older even with reading glasses. That tells me there is clumsiness built into the program. The easiest way to adjust mid tones is by using the 'Levels' settings on the Exposure panel, just drag the bar in the centre to the left or right and this will make the adjustment. A small thing, but a massive timesaver.
What about yours? Plugins are the one feature that I love from Lightroom. Finally, Capture One is allowing plug-ins to work with their system.
With this being new the range is limited, but obviously, this will increase over time. At launch the plugins are limited, but this will grow and become a great time saver for many users. This means you can add the FujiFilm preset onto your images and use this as a starting point in your editing. Please comment below to help me out. In all seriousness though, this is awesome for all you Fuji Owners. As a Mac user, this is my biggest pet peeve with Capture One.
With the release of version 12, support for version 11 has now ended. Testing them along the way, I settled on my own custom keyboards shortcuts for Windows Figure 6. I had decided early on not to move all my existing images to Capture One Pro but instead a all new images would go directly into Capture One Pro catalog and b over time I would move existing Lightroom images into the Capture One Pro catalog when I worked on them.
While this might not be a clean-cut shift away from Lightroom, I felt it was the right approach for me. I wanted to really focus using Capture One Pro on my new photos and not risk previous processing work. At the bottom of the article, I have links to resources I found helpful in my education and transition to Capture One Pro.
Working on images and continuously learning about Capture One Pro, helps me identify ways to refine and update my workflow. As I become comfortable with Capture One Pro, I make minor tweaks to my workflow and enhancements to my workspace. In January, after upgrading to Capture One Pro 10 and attending the new Webinars , I updated my workflow map and tool tab layout to reflect my Capture One Pro workflow.
All this being said, the high learning curve often has me frustrated. Simple things like renaming files or switching from grid to single image view are different in Capture One and they all take some getting used to. Capture One Pro is feature-rich with just about everything a photographer needs in an editing app.
As far as photo editors go, there are a couple of places where Capture One just rocks it. Here are a few of the other advantages of using Capture One Pro over Lightroom, or most of the other image editing softwares out there:. Each brand has their own special recipe for rendering RAW files, but Capture One has long been known for being exceptional. Take a quick look at the video below to see how the photographer uses Capture One Pro to edit high-end fashion portraits.
As far as the level and selection of standard adjustment tools are concerned — exposure, contrast, shadows, highlights, white balance, and so on — Capture One is up there with the best. Some things are done differently, however. To edit straight-up saturation you need to go to another tab. Capture One Pro comes with an excellent Keystone adjustment. Pro only, not Express. There are plenty of useful autocorrect options for just about every tool, and these work better than my version of Lightroom.
The auto levels adjustment seems particularly spot on. The Express version is obviously a bit more limited. Capture One has these too. When you use layers in Capture One Pro , you can make targeted adjustments to your photos and still use the majority of the image editing tools available, not just the ones in a given tool. This is a huge benefit for those who like a fine level of control over photo manipulation. For mask creation you can paint them in manually, create a linear gradient mask, or a radial gradient mask similar to Luminar, actually.
It also offers a feathering tool and edge refinements. The Luma Range feature in Capture One Pro is a particularly useful way of selecting areas of an image. Everything from Levels to Color Balance tools work in layers, and you can adjust the opacity of each edit layer — something that can only be done by way of a third party plugin in Lightroom see these Lightroom Tips for more info.
This latest version of Capture One Pro 12 now has luminosity masks. From there you can adjust the affected color range, hue, saturation and lightness. The 3-Way option even lets you adjust the color tint separately in the shadow, midtone and highlight areas. Do you want to affect the blues in your photo, but not the blue-greens? Need to smooth out the skin tones? No problem. Simply choose the Skin Tone tab, select a color range, and adjust the uniformity sliders.
The Express version just has the Basic tab. However, if you want to have complete control over your color , Capture One certainly wins hands down over Lightroom and everyone else in the same niche.
If you shoot in a studio, odds are you know the value of shooting tethered. Most studio photographers who shoot tethered already use Capture One. Tethering features in Capture One Pro makes it the obvious choice for studio photographers. With it you can control just about everything via the tether, including details as particular as the flash curtain sync mode.
If you were ever thinking of shooting tethered, Capture One is the editing software to try first. It also just looks better — almost on par with Photoshop which is where I usually do my more difficult spot healing.
If you send your work off to an editor or work with a team, Capture One Pro has an annotations feature that makes collaboration much easier. Definitely helpful for collaborative editing or sending an image with notes off to a client. Capture One allows you to organize according to your photography sessions instead of of using the catalog. Intelligent grouping and placement of menus — even in their default locations — helps immensely. Collections are aggregates of images.
Some cannot be changed by the user : all images, recent imports or captures, and the trash. You organize your own Catalogs in the User Collections area. Capture One Pro 8 supports four ways to group, relate and organize your images logically, and to aid manipulation, viewing and exporting etc: Albums, Smart Albums, Projects each the equivalents of the same in Aperture , and Groups the equivalent of a Folder in Aperture. Smart Albums will usually be placed inside Projects. Groups are free-form organizational tools.
Sounds complicated. But hardly more so than in Aperture. These are Groups in Capture One Pro.
Capture One Pro Review | Image Editing Software - About the Author
Теплая приятная ладонь прикасалась к ее коже. И все для того, чтобы мы могли что-нибудь сделать, пустой и темный тоннель. Ричард, обняв ее за плечи.
Comments
Post a Comment